16.06.2010
Present: Mr. Yogesh Swroop and Mr. Ranjeet Khatri, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaideep Malik, APP for the State with Inspector Sudhir Kumar.
Bail Application No.1107/2010
When the parties were living together, wife (complainant) was allegedly beaten up by the petitioner (husband), who is an advocate. It is stated by counsel for the petitioner that the injuries on the person of the wife as given in MLC were self-inflicted and he can show how such injuries can be self-inflicted.
The SHO, Inspector Sudhir Kumar, who is present in court, shall be informed by the petitioner/applicant before he starts inflicting these kinds of injuries on himself and the Inspector shall prepare a video of the injuries so inflicted by the applicant on himself. After inflicting injuries, the SHO shall take him to the hospital for opinion.
If the applicant is able to show that these injuries can be self- inflicted on the same parts of the body as were found on body parts of the wife, this court shall consider this application for bail on 21st June, 2010.
A copy of this order be given DASTI.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
21.06.2010
Present: Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaideep Malik, APP for the State.
Bail Application No.1107/2010
This application has been moved on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail.
On the last date of hearing, the applicant had told the court that he can show that the injuries on the person of his wife were self-inflicted injuries by inflicting the same kind of injuries on his own person. Now, he states that the applicant was afraid that he may incur some infection and the applicant can otherwise convince the court that these injuries were self- inflicted.
The injuries as shown in MLC of the wife do not seem to be self- inflicted injuries. I do not think it is a case for grant of anticipatory bail.
The application is dismissed.
Dasti.
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
[VACATION JUDGE]
JUNE 21, 2010
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
No comments:
Post a Comment